The argument: “Republicans are so evil and terrible they don’t want this poor soul here or that poor soul there who is crushed by the evil corporations to have public health care.”
The retort: “This poor soul here and that poor soul there don’t want public health care either.”
The rejoinder: “That is because you are all stupid and corrupted by talk radio and are racist.”
The obvious: You catch more flies with honey. That is to say you make better arguments if you know what is actually in the bill that was passed and don’t just rebuke every cogent question or argument with the assertion of what you SUPPOSE reform will be then vilify those asking the questions or making the arguments.
Comments